Write descriptive essay about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie 2014, write an essay of at least 500 words on The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, 5 paragraph essay on The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, definition essay, descriptive essay, dichotomy essay.
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1
Adventure, Sci-Fi
IMDB rating:
Francis Lawrence
Woody Harrelson as Haymitch Abernathy
Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen
Paula Malcomson as Katniss' Mother
Natalie Dormer as Cressida
Liam Hemsworth as Gale Hawthorne
Sam Claflin as Finnick Odair
Stanley Tucci as Caesar Flickerman
Josh Hutcherson as Peeta Mellark
Toby Jones as Claudius Templesmith
Jena Malone as Johanna Mason
Julianne Moore as President Alma Coin
Philip Seymour Hoffman as Plutarch Heavensbee
Jeffrey Wright as Beetee
Donald Sutherland as President Snow
Elizabeth Banks as Effie Trinket
Storyline: With the Games destroyed, Katniss Everdeen, along with Gale, Finnick and Beetee, end up in the so thought "destroyed" District 13. Under the leadership of President Coin and the advice of her friends, Katniss becomes the "Mockingjay", the symbol of rebellion for the districts of Panem.
Type Resolution File Size Codec Bitrate Format
1080p 1920x802 px 8728 Mb h264 9933 Kbps mkv Download
HQ DVD-rip 720x304 px 1404 Mb mpeg4 1666 Kbps avi Download
So terribly boring my sister began FARTING to entertain herself.

I'm only writing the further because IMDb required a minimum of 10 lines.

This movie is nothing remotely similar to the first two movies. The worse of all sequels in a series. It consists of long drawn out rants will literally almost nothing being said or done in the entire movie.

2 HOURS OF REPEATED NON-SENSE AND DRONING. I mean this honestly, acknowledging it might sound extreme; this was the worst film I've ever seen.
A war fought over a teenage romance
I really wanted to like this movie, trust me. I tried giving the books a shot and didn't like the style, the first movie was alright but the second was pretty good. This movie however, is filled with the most arbitrary plot points a five year old could possibly conceive. It seems that the entire resistance movement spends the movie convincing themselves that Katniss and her boy toy matter in the scheme of things. Honestly I'd be spoiling the plot if I elaborated, but it involves dropping flowers after a bombing run, throwing around intel like hot potatoes, and the weakest sleeper agent anyone could find. Honestly the presidents actions have become so contrived that every scene he had was him being filled in on how stupid his enemies were and then just staring off into the distance and muttering something cryptic. There were so many stupid scenes that I laughed out loud several times. There was seriously a scene where a deer looks at Katniss pointing a bow at it and just casually looks away. Gale then mutters "it's never been hunted before." Apparently the screenwriters believe fear and fight or flight are conditioned responses. There was also a scene with Katniss, a flashlight and a cat, where she plays that game that everyone plays with cats where they chase the light. As she does this she seems to have an epiphany about her current situation and I'm all like "okay now this is good, the cat is the resistance, and the light symbolizes freedom. This could be some good stuff." She then walks over to one of the other tribute boy toys and basically says that it made her realize she needs to save her boyfriend...So much potential for good sci-fi squandered on typical teen romance bullshit
A total bore, left after 60 minutes
I usually watch a movie till its end. This was the second case I left the cinema in the middle of a movie.

I can't understand the people giving this uninspired movie such high scores.

From the beginning till the moment we left this movie dragged along, without anything much happening. And understand me right, I've never been a fan of high-paced dull action-movies either. So, it is not that this movie is about being an action packed flick. This is about cinematography, the art of script-writing, telling an interesting story, creating suspense, of which this movie lacks all of it. The only instance of suspense was such a dumb and dull example of template-based Hollywood scripting that I wanted to rip the screen apart: I mean how creative is a scene which creates suspense by using the lever of an emergency situation, where within a 1-minute countdown all doors are closed in an underground bunker? And of course the heroine rescues her friend and the affable dog just 2 seconds before the massive steel doors would have crushed her bones and spilled the screen with blood.

Having read the review of another IMDb reviewer where she details how the author of the Hunger Games series actually copied and stole the ideas from a range of Japanese movies and mangas, I totally believe that. Because this is just a dumb, uninspired copycat attempt of doing something, but lacks the heart and passion.

Above all, what the hell is so interesting anyway about a teenage girl becoming a soldier? Is this a trivial attempt to recruit more female soldiers into the army? Because that is exactly how it looked like: like a remake of Top Gun for girls.

Another tidbit: who on earth goes out to fight in the battlefield only armed with a bow and a handful of color coded arrows against a fleet of remote-controlled fighter jets? And above all what is the sense of color codes if the arrows are behind your head where you don't see any colors ...

This movie is so flawed, I don't even know where to stop ...
totally disappointed and frustrated
There is nothing to tell about this move. it is a test to your patience. I did watch hunger games films. This was a worst movie i saw recently. it is just 2 hour narration of same piece of information again and again, again and again. movie won't go further and do not except a single action sequence even though in the movie, there is war going on as part of story. from begin to end, all they did is just talking in different places ( a bunker or ruined building or near a lake).

only scenes I liked were fights carried by rebels against capital.if you are going to this film do't dare to have any expectation. i hope that they will make part 2 in much better way.
Is there such thing as a set-up movie?
I had never heard the term "set-up movie" before today. There has definitely been a trend of splitting up a story into multiple movies. These movies don't have a beginning-middle-end the same way other movies do but at the very least there's some progress.

The problem with the Mockingjay Pt 1 is not that it's boring or poorly made. In fact, there is a lot of excitement in this movie. The problem is that from beginning to end there is hardly anything that changes. If you look at where the characters are in the beginning and where they are in the end there isn't much that's changed except for what happens in the very end. Katniss has been doing things but we haven't seen much of the effects of her actions.

I didn't dislike this movie that much despite it's slow beginning. I just can't give this my seal of approval when I left the theater feeling like I saw half a movie. By the time the story gets its payoff my memory of this movie will be worn-off.
Don't waste your money
If i were you i wouldn't go to the cinema, I've already wasted my money don't waste yours too. The division in two parts is merely commercial, they haven't earned enough money with the first and the second movie (sarcasm). In principle the division could have been a good thing for the scenography, the narration and so on, but they have cut the story in the wrong point. In the end we have a slow and boring movie. In the most of the film there wasn't any action, just one arrow is shot by Katniss through all the movie! And in the majority of the film there was no tension. I didn't like the scenography, i.e. what they have chosen to play. The book is so much better. So, my advise is: Buy the book and read it, Don't Watch this crappy movie!
What have happened here?
No, seriously? I thought I made a huge mistake and went to a kinder garden movie or something. At the end of this film there was a very serious dilemma in my mind – to cry or to laugh. To cry for the time and money I spend, or to laugh at what I just saw? To cry for the people who will be misled by their expectations from the book, or to laugh about the people who actually put a lot of effort in creating this "thing".

Where to begin? Directing. May be Francis Lawrence idea was to show us that he is capable of making bad movies as well as good ones. Constantine was good. A little bit above average. I am Legend was very good! Especially for the fans of the genre. Water for Elephants was a soap opera but it wasn't bad. And now this … My guess is that he left his skills, his talent and everything he knew about creating movies and started from the bottom. I felt like the director of this movie was learning how to direct during this shootings … Usually what we see on the screen is the director perspective of the story. We see how he sees things. If this is his perspective about this potentially good plot, than he is the one to blame for the crap we see.

Adaptation. I didn't read the books. They weren't so famous in my country when the first movie came on the big screen. At first I was interested. I am a fantasy fan, a sci-fi fan I love this kind of stories. Some things didn't make sense but it was all right. Then the second movie repeated everything from the first one. Why? And on top of that the story doesn't give anything original or unique. I have read a lot of similar books and I have watched a lot of similar films. Where is the one thing that is supposed to grab the attention? May be the book is better. But there is nothing in the world that can make me read it now.

Dialogue. OMG. This was seriously the worst part of this movie. Who wrote that script? Hello! We are not that dumb, okay? Most of the sentences were as simple as they were written for children. Every scene was so obvious that everyone should be able to predict it! Most of the lines for the main characters were extremely lame and flat. You can hear your mind finishing the speech before the actors said it.

I can continue more and more but this is enough. The last thing – *SPOILER* the scene with the sister where she left her cat and she ran to save it. HA-HA-HA :D. 5 minutes of creating funny tension with loud sounds and creepy music. Just a lot of shouting and running up and down. A scene totally unrelated with the plot, completely useless in terms of creating or developing character (if there is developing of any kind :D) and absolutely boring.

1 point for Jenifer Lawrence, 1 point in memory of Seymour Hoffman and 1 point for the movie.
What Have I Just Watched!
This is my first ever review on IMDb and wow can I just say this is not worth watching.

The acting is beyond tame in comparison with the first two movies and it has been dragged out beyond believe!

I was even in the so called cinema listening to people crying with laughter some how at scenes which were supposed to be emotionally constructed!

The only respectable appearance was from Josh Hutcherson aka "Peeta Mellark" who should have more of a role as he gave some substance to a film which was made as a money spinner and has ruined my film experience!

3/10 is very generous!
Do yourself a favour
Do not waste your time and money by going to this movie. I haven't watched the previous parts but I knew the story. The whole story could be told in 5 minutes. Nothing new in new series, while the old one didn't have much! I understand the movie was probably targeted for youth but I love to watch cartoons that are for kids. The only nice thing in this movie was the main actor Jennifer Lawrence who looked beautiful but it is not limited to this movie (She looks gorgeous on any movie she played or any media).

I wish there was score ZERO so that I could vote it for this movie.

The worst movie I have ever seen in Movie Theater by far!
BATTLE ROYALE 2: REQUIEM gets Plagiarized for Big Profits
The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 fails to bring any of the creative fun of the second Battle Royale movie. This second one is pretty juvenile, coming across as mainly a trite rehash of the official BR sequel (and a bore). Jennifer Lawrence, who was captivating in the first ripoff, is too fine an actress to be treated to such a thoughtless and obvious plagiarism. I suppose we will watch the third installment in two parts just to see how BR2 turned out, but hopefully the creators will make a production that exceeds this by-the-numbers copy job.

An absolutely horrible movie. Wheres's the fighting to the death? No violence, no particular plot line to follow. Very poorly made movie. The only thing that impressed me about this movie was that I managed to stay awake for the whole thing.
Write descriptive essay about The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie 2014, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 movie essay, literary essay The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 essay writing, narrative essay, The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1 500 word essay, argumentative essay The Hunger Games: Mockingjay - Part 1.