Write descriptive essay about Raiders of the Lost Ark movie 1981, write an essay of at least 500 words on Raiders of the Lost Ark, 5 paragraph essay on Raiders of the Lost Ark, definition essay, descriptive essay, dichotomy essay.
Raiders of the Lost Ark
Year:
1981
Country:
USA
Genre:
Action, Adventure
IMDB rating:
8.6
Director:
Steven Spielberg
Harrison Ford as Indiana Jones
Karen Allen as Marion
Paul Freeman as Belloq
Ronald Lacey as Toht
Denholm Elliott as Marcus Brody
Alfred Molina as Satipo
Wolf Kahler as Dietrich
Anthony Higgins as Gobler
Vic Tablian as Barranca
Don Fellows as Col. Musgrove
William Hootkins as Major Eaton
Bill Reimbold as Bureaucrat
Storyline: The year is 1936. A professor who studies archeology named Indiana Jones is venturing in the jungles in South America searching for a golden statue. Unfortunately, he sets off a deadly trap doing so, miraculously, he escapes. Then, Jones hears from a museum curator named Marcus Brody about a biblical artifact called The Ark of the Covenant, which can hold the key to humanly existence. Jones has to venture to vast places such as Nepal and Egypt to find this artifact. However, he will have to fight his enemy Renee Belloq and a band of Nazis in order to reach it.
Type Resolution File Size Codec Bitrate Format
1080p 1920x816 px 14642 Mb h264 17752 Kbps mkv Download
Reviews
criticism of Raiders of the Lost Ark
Every movie show Cairo is old fashion from eighteen century,Cairo at this time in movie is more beautiful than Paris.Try to review the History.And I love that series but it's representative performance of some of the characters is very weak.ِAt that time Britain occupies Egypt and the Germans did not enter Egypt.Historical information mostly wrong
2017-03-09
"It's not the years, honey - it's the mileage."
Da da DA DA

Da da duhhh

There are countless instantly recognizable movie themes - many of them written by John Williams. But there are none quite as instantly transformative as those two sets of ascending four notes on the horn that instantly spell 'Indiana Jones.' Four notes, and we're skidding under a closing temple door, a juggernaut boulder crashing behind us, dodging blow darts, pausing only to retrieve our hat. Four notes, and we unconsciously stop to absently brush the spiders and cobwebs off us, so entranced are we by the thrill of our archaeological treasure hunt. Four notes, and we're off to the movies - Raiders of the Lost Ark alongside Doctor Jones. And there's nowhere we'd rather be.

You could rattle off Raiders' iconic moments for the duration of its run time ("throw me the whip!"/"Throw me the idol!"; 'Gun to a sword fight'; "Why'd it have to be snakes?!"), and still fall short of its iconic magic. But why Indy? Granted, the former Indiana Smith, the man all but christened James Bond's father (see part III for a cheeky wink at that) by his own 'parents,' the indomitable Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, is a fun character. He's a perfect foil to subject to all the action, intrigue, globetrotting, and treasure hunting joys that proliferated the matinée adventure serials of his pappy's boyhoods. And we have him (and them) for forever cementing archaeology as THE COOLEST profession shy of a firefighting superhero astronaut in the eyes of generations of youth.

Spielberg clearly knew they were onto something here, and reciprocates by being on the top of his game, delivering the quintessence of a robust, brawny, populist cinematic adventure as only he can. His opening act - again, a 007 homage - is immediately unforgettable, introducing the titular hero as a dramatic silhouette, easily outmaneuvering his cowering guide (the exquisitely weaselly Alfred Molina) as he's beset by a franchise's worth of booby traps. It's a slow build from there, toeing the line of leisurely, despite an explosive bar brawl in the Himalayas (including another unforgettable introduction for Karen Allen's tough-as-nails, exceptionally charismatic Marion Ravenwood) to tide us by. But soon enough, we're thrust into the thick of snake-filled antiquity ruins, besieged by Nazis (who else?), and from then on, the film is unstoppable. Crisp editing, flawlessly dusty cinematography, and the magnificently grandiose archaeological sets ignite the film with a rambunctious, sand-etched enthusiasm, while the action sequences bristle with breathtaking intensity (remember to return from the edge of your seat after watching Jones sucked under a moving truck, or ducking under a plane propeller mid-fistfight) coupled with disarming matinée silliness. And that climax - probably the most literal 'Deus Ex Machina' in cinema history? 'Exhilarating' is the understatement of a thousand lifetimes.

But the real joy, the real 'je ne sais quoi' of Raiders of the Lost Ark lives in its tiny, throwaway moments - many buoyed by Spielberg's savagely cheeky sense of humour, or flair for unexpectedly iconic character beats. "Love You" on a student's eyelids flustering Jones mid-lesson. Indiana interrupting Marcus Brody (the delightful Denholm Elliot)'s line - clearly unscripted - because he's so excited about archaeology. John Rhys-Davies' bombastically lovable Sallah bursting into Gilbert and Sullivan because he's "so pleased you're not dead!" Arch-rival Belloq (perfectly preening yet oddly dignified Paul Freeman) bursting into laughter when drunkenly threatened by a knife. Insidious, scar-handed Nazi stooge Toht (unforgettably grotesque Ronald Lacey) giggling nervously when the Ark of the Covenant is revealed to be full of dust. Indiana falling asleep amidst what should be a passionate love scene. And, of course, the unforgettable 'brought a gun to a sword fight' standoff. These are what elevate the movie from good, spirited fun to the level of unforgettable movie magic. These are what make it truly special.

Still, there are two indisputable MVPs for Raiders' rampant success: John Williams, and Harrison Ford. Never before have music and actor fused into such an unforgettable driving force of a character - a hero who really sweats, bleeds, grunts, cusses, undercuts his triumphant introduction by whining about snakes, and cements his place at the forefront of thirty-five years worth of audiences' hearts. It's easy to overlook Ford's razor-sharp comedic timing amidst his brimming, crusty charisma, but watch for his exasperated, exhausted grimaces when confronted by a superfluously sword-swinging adversary, fumbling aboard a descending Nazi submarine, or challenged to bareknuckle boxing mid-plane hijack, and the film reaches a level of sublime, almost peerless character comedy. It's this crystalline grounding of impossible feats within the characterization of a man who risks his life for museum artifacts that sells the inherent ridiculousness of Indiana Jones, taking him from self-parody to genre-defining, and spawning innumerable, inherently inferior knock-offs. Freeman's Belloq's villainous jeers prove prophetic: Jones is now an unshakable, invaluable part of modern cultural history. And he doesn't even have to be quarantined to a museum.

There's an argument to be made that The Last Crusade peps up the already nearly airtight formula with more comedy and action for your buck, and Temple of Doom, while clumsy and flawed, delves into some intriguingly grim terrain (what's a Crystal Skull? You must've been dreaming). Still, the word classic isn't used lightly, and Raiders of the Lost Ark remains just that: a game-changing, fundamental force in escapist cinematic perfection. So forget about your pesky real world problems! Because you are at the MOVIES, with Spielberg, Johnny Williams, and the perennially grimacing Indiana Jones. And here, everything is going to be okay. You're in good hands. Whose good hands? Top. Men.

Duh duh DA da duh DA da

Duh DA DA da dahhhh

-10/10
2016-11-13
Lame
Most people give this movie a 10 out of 10 because they don't consider the movie but rather how happy they were to discover it as a child but now, in 2005, it has become obviously outdated, the script is quite bad and the acting is even worse. Harrisson Ford obviously should have worked his acting better, which he happily did since that movie. I am sorry I cannot just keep on lying about this movie: this is for your kids but in now way should it be put among masterpieces. IMDb is a web site about movies, not about cult and self-proclaimed nerds or geeks. You have to determine how good is a movie according to artistical criteria, neither to your gregarious instinct nor to your "attitude".
2005-05-04
The best adventure film we currently have
This film is a legend and an icon. You'd have to scour to the most far flung corners of the Earth to find a cinemagoer who isn't at least familiar with the opening idol raid sequence, which sparked off pretty much every subsequent rip-off cliché of the genre you can think of.

Other films have burrowed similarly deep into the public eye. There aren't many of them, but they have. For example, Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back, with its, "I am your father" speech; The Good, the Bad and the Ugly, with its near-impossible-to-not-recognise theme song; and Forrest Gump, with its "Life is like a box of chocolates" line.

I would also – purely for the sake of self-indulgence – like to add Pulp Fiction to this list of examples, as I feel that to not include Vincent's mouth-watering, "It feels like a wax museum with a pulse", would be criminal, as that's currently my favourite line from any film ever; and that's saying something when you've got the legendary one-liners from Shawshank to contend with. Not that said line is as well recognised as any of the above examples; it's a biased, subjective world out there, guys.

When a movie packs a punch like that, it's guaranteed to give you a good time.

What do I like about this film? Well, the strongest factor is the action sequences. It's no lean feat squeezing entirely crowd-pleasing action into a PG-rated film, but Spielberg has achieved just that and more. You'd have to be on something illegal to not be entertained by any one of said sequences. Pretty much every form of combat you can imagine is here.

There're gunfights and hand-to-hand tussles galore; and there's a prolonged truck-chase scene which is so varied and effectively tongue-in-cheek in tone, that it feels as though God himself has listened to the prayers of the action junkies and answered them all in said scene alone. About the only form of action missing is sword-and-sandal, but because the opportunity for it is dispatched in such a smarmy and witty way, by the casual whipping out of a gun, you'd have to be proper miserable to not forgive this.

The central storyline is admittedly not that complex, but the execution and payoff of it throughout the film as a whole actually makes you glad of this rather than deflated. I think that if Spielberg had tried to cram in too many complex ulterior themes and sub-plots, that would have made the film feel rather too treacly and slow.

But here, the simplicity is the mighty saving grace, because it makes the film feel really easy-going, and in itself boosts the entertainment value hugely. Raiders is, at its bare bones, a run-of-the-mill treasure hunt archaeological globe-trot adventure. There's nothing particularly original or complex about the premise, but that automatically makes it a hit, simply because you don't have to switch on your grey cells to get it. Think of Raiders as a roller-coaster ride; so, in other words, while watching it, just sit back, relax and enjoy the fun!

That's not to say, though, that this film doesn't have complex elements. Necessary religious dimensions are ushered in there, as the Ark is quite literally the Almighty's chest of wonders; as Belloq puts it, it's "a radio for speaking to God." This rather deep underlying theme is catered for brilliantly by Williams' supernaturally brilliant compositions. I mean, the scene where Indie is bringing all his sources together in that Egyptian tomb, to finally uncover the exact location of the Ark; the score for that scene is musical diamond; simply SWEEPING, it is.

The film is well acted too. Harrison Ford is perfect as Indie, being crammed full of zany charisma and surprisingly endearing indirect temperamental wit. And pretty much every other central character is also worthy of note. Marion Ravenwood is a suitably feisty tag-along who puts all the "damsel-in-distress" stereotypes well and truly to bed. Sallah, a wacky and exuberant Egyptian, is another of Indie's memorable companions. And the utterly detestable René Belloq; with his thoroughly wicked and menacing crony, Major Toht; is a totally apt main villain. The list of great characters just goes on and on, and this is another of the factors which makes this film stand out from others of the genre.

The cinematography and camera-work are also great. The way the film is shot further adds to the easy-going, "comic-book-like" tone, and there are also a few great editing techniques in there that help in this regard as well. We get hand-drawn maps of the world with a cute little travelling red dot on them, clearly showing where Indie's going on his travels; followed by the adventure scenes themselves, which are all shot to tonal perfection. It all adds up to make an entirely charismatic film experience.

The final act must also be mentioned. The ending of this film is entirely rewarding, meeting and then exceeding your expectations. It delivers a concluding pay-off which properly stuns you in your seat, allowing all of the religious elements of the story to mingle one hundred percent harmoniously with the adventure. This ensures that the ending is thoroughly redemptive, and that the movie is about as far from messy as it's possible to get.

Is there anything I don't like? No.

Verdict: 100%. In every sense, the perfect adventure film, and the firm benchmark for all the rest. The action is next-level; the characters are spot on; the storyline is the stark opposite of boring; the camera-work, editing and cinematography are stage-lifters; and the central themes make it the most necessary film of its kind, hands down. I implore you: watch this movie. It's a film for all.
2017-04-28
High Adventure With Indiana.
Harrison Ford makes his first appearance as Indiana Jones in this exciting, highly entertaining globe-trotting adventure, which finds archaeologist and college professor Jones pursuing Nazis who are searching for the Ark of the Covenant, with which they hope to use its mystical powers to help them conquer the world in Pre-World War II[1936] days.

Harrison Ford became a huge star in his own right(not just as Han Solo) and is highly appealing and capable, really making Indiana come to life in this fantastic story, helped by a fine cast featuring Karen Allen, John Rhys Davies, and Denholm Elliot. Steven Spielberg directs in a breathless and inspired way, and this film is great fun(just don't ponder its credibility too closely...)
2013-08-30
The Standard For Action/Adventure
I've probably seen "Raiders Of The Lost Ark" as many times as any other movie I've ever watched in my life. Each year or two from age 12 or so now to age 31, I've sat down and enjoyed this film. The amazing thing about it? It never seems to get old!

For a basic plot summary, "Raiders" sees archaeology professor Dr. Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) getting a tip that the Nazis are digging at the supposed place of the long-lost Ark of the Covenant. Armed with his trusty whip, adventurer's cap, leather jacket, and journal of clues, Indy rushes to Cairo for perhaps the greatest "find" of his life. Along the way, he meets up with old flame Marion (Karen Allen), as well as getting himself both in and out of numerous dramatic scrapes.

Almost without a doubt, "Raiders" set the standard to which action/adventure movies are now held. The music is eternal, the scale is large, and the action is always moving ahead despite still being able to support interesting characters/dialogue. Only helping matters is the fact that Ford is perfectly cast as Indy, creating what is at least in the conversation for most iconic film role of all-time. From the very first time you see Indy, you know that this guy is an adventurer through and through. It's tough to have such a visceral connection to a character without any background, but director Steven Spielberg makes it seem effortless.

I could go on and on about why "Raiders" is such a great film (both technically and culturally), but I'll suffice it to say that some 36 years after its initial theatrical release it still remains not only a classic in the "stuffy" sense, but also a movie that new viewers of today can appreciate just as much. People 36 years from now will be saying the same things...I'm sure of it!
2017-02-25
The mother of countless silly action movies
Since everybody knows what this movie is about, mine will be a review of the strongest and weakest points. At the time of release, this seemed a brand new approach to storytelling. I am not surprised it was a big success: Harrison Ford was smoldering hot and the supporting cast was great, with a special mention to John Rhys-Davies.

With the passing of time and repeated views, I find the following weaknesses, common to many Spielberg (and action) movies:

- the overbearing soundtrack. I know many love it, I cannot stand it anymore. During the truck chase scene, there is nothing but the loud orchestra score booming ceaselessly, while Indy gets beaten but bounces back like a rubber man

- the thin plot. The search for the Ark is just an excuse to create one action scene after the other. They increase in violence and implausibility, until the last one, possibly the silliest of the movie

- the last "action scene". The ritual proposed by Belloq serves no purpose, apart from providing a bombastic ending to Indy's troubles. Anyway, it is unbelievable to imagine that Nazi troops would indulge the request of the French archaeologist

- the "super hero" nature of Indy. Despite the premise that he is a "normal" guy, Indy is shown to suffer only slightly from inhuman beatings

- all the sequels. None managed to reach even half-way the level of "Raiders" and considering this one already had its flaws….

On the plus side:

- there are some moments of humour, unfortunately not enough. The best is the famous scene of Indy shooting the huge, menacing black-clad guy in the market. For one precious scene like this, we have the long and pointless fight with the German guarding the plane, back to conventional narrative…

- an attractive hero with some intellectual pretense. Indy is supposed to be a beauty with a brain, contrary to way too many superheroes who are infesting the silver screen (even more so nowadays)

- the ironic ending

Conclusion: what seemed an innocuous narrative that looked back to the old serial movies of the past, turned into a monster that spawned endless sequels and imitators, creating the action-without-soul blockbusters plaguing more than ever contemporary cinema.
2017-04-10
Glaring Story Problem
Like Amy said in The Big Bang Theory, Indiana Jones had no affect on the outcome of the movie whatsoever. If he wasn't in the movie, the Nazis would've have found the arc, opened it, and died just like they did. Other than that, still one of my favorite movies of all. But Dr. Jones could've saved himself a lot of pain if he would've stayed home!
2017-02-19
Classic action movie, and one of the best of all time
This movie, it's got well timed humor, engaging action scenes, likable main characters, thorough character development, and a plot that's actually interesting. This excellent film will forever be in my heart. It's got everything every action movie should have that many of this particular genre in today's time are missing, character development, relationships (whether friendship,family, or romance), witty jokes that are pulled out at the time, suspense, human weaknesses, and guts. Hollywood needs to learn from the classics (and I don't mean we should re make the stinking film, which has become a trend in the industry lately, i suppose for some fast bucks)
2017-04-23
Adventure, Action
Harrison Ford, "Indiana Jones" and his friends are searching for treasure, that can save the world from evil. If evil people find this treasure, the world will become ruled by evil and darkness. Indiana Jones realize that his friends are not quite good fellows as he thought. This movie contains lot of action and humor and bit of romantic scenes. Indiana Jones cant trust nobody, only His hat, whip and his revolver. This movie contains also few some scary scenes, dinner sacrificing etc. This movie suites for all movie categories, cause it's so allround. This movie also was a box office at the cinemas world wide.
2016-10-16
Write descriptive essay about Raiders of the Lost Ark movie 1981, Raiders of the Lost Ark movie essay, literary essay Raiders of the Lost Ark, Raiders of the Lost Ark essay writing, narrative essay, Raiders of the Lost Ark 500 word essay, argumentative essay Raiders of the Lost Ark.
×